The Israel
Policy Center
äîøëæ äîãéðé
ìéùøàì
Building A Jewish Democracy
Israel
Police Prevent Use of Jewish-Owned Property in Jerusalem
On three occasions during the months of July and August representatives
of Mountain Dwellers Ltd, a Jerusalem property
company, attempted to perform construction and agricultural work in 180 hectares (45 acres) of private
property under its management in the Eastern Gate (“Shaar
Mizrach”) area of Jerusalem.
Eastern Gate is located between the French Hill neighborhood and the
Arab neighborhood of Anata in Jerusalem’s
northeast corner, within the Jerusalem
city limits. On each occasion Israeli
police forcibly expelled the company’s representatives from the site, without
warrant and apparently without legal grounds.
Part of Mountain Dwellers Ltd.’s property in Eastern
Gate has been seized by the IDF for the purpose of constructing the security
fence. Arab squatters have built illegal
dwellings on another part, and Mountain Dwellers was forced to go to court to evict
them, incidentally establishing in court its rights to the property in
question.
Whenever Mountain Dwellers’ agents attempt to begin work on their
property, the police follow a standard procedure: Mountain Dwellers’ agents are arrested and
transported to the police station in Jerusalem Russian Compound. They are interrogated,
left to cool their heels for several hours, and then released without
charge. On the last occasion when this
happened, August 20, a
representative of Mountain Dwellers told police officers that they were
trespassing without warrant on private land and insisted that the police
leave. The representative was assaulted,
transported to the Russian Compound, and charged with assaulting a police
officer.
On July 31 Mountain Dwellers Ltd. filed suit in Israel’s High Court of Justice
requesting a restraining order against the police to prevent the expulsion of
its representatives from its land. The
High Court of Justice, however, set a court date in March to consider Mountain
Dweller’s suit. Mountain Dwellers has
requested that the court bring forward the date so that it can get on with
developing its property.
The prevention of a private property owner from developing his property
within the Jerusalem
city limits with no evident legal sanction represents a serious violation of
private property rights. Police have
provided no explanation of their interference in the matter, other than to tell
representatives of Mountain Dwellers during interrogations that they (the
police) acted to secure “public order.”
Police reluctance to uphold rather than violate private property rights
in Jerusalem
may stem from their desire not to become involved in defending Jewish property
rights in an area next to an Arab neighborhood.
If so, it means that the police are prepared to use force to prevent
Jewish owners from realizing their property rights rather than defend those
rights from possible interference.